Exclusive: ‘Star Trek’ Teaser Trailer Description Surfaces Online

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
No votes yet

CHICAGO – HollywoodChicago.com on Tuesday had a trusted source post on our message boards a description of the upcoming teaser trailer for J.J. Abrams’ “Star Trek”.

Following this post, various other movie sites (see a list of independent validations here) have confirmed the accuracy of this information with multiple sources along with a source at Paramount Pictures. Here’s our exclusive teaser trailer description. Warning: This is full spoiler information about the teaser trailer.

Here’s the “Star Trek” trailer description. Hope you can use it.

Slow Paramount logo.

Bad Robot logo.

Black, suddenly some sparks (very saturated [with] Michael Bay-looking cinematography).

We hear an old NASA radio countdown: “30 seconds and counting.”

Close up of a timeless guy with goggles leaning down doing some wielding and sparks flying around.

He lifts his googles. Slightly futuristic head covering. It’s not a space suit, by the way.

The dude leans down and wields some more. He’s standing on big metal.

“From director J.J. Abrams” (blue font with a nice lens flare).

Some Kennedy speech about space flight: “The eyes of the world now look to space.”

People walking around the saucer section. The wielders are everywhere – showing size.

We hear: “The eagle has landed.”

Huge overhead shot pans across [and] suddenly [shows] what looks like miles of scaffolding underneath.

Title: “The future begins”.

Really impressive shot from … people all over the ship and you can see a huge industrialized city or shipyard in the background. It’s being built on Earth [rather than] in space.

Neil Armstrong: “One small step for man…”

Camera slowly cranes up over the whole saucer section.

Then we hear Leonard Nimoy’s line: “Space. The final frontier…” and the familiar “Star Trek” theme horns.

The shot continues [and reveals] the writing on the top of the saucer – “U.S.S. Enterprise” – and these huge aircraft-like warp engines in the background. Technically, the first reveal of what we’re seeing.

Just the Starfleet log (no title).

Title card: “Under construction”.

“Christmas 2008”

Overall, really great teaser (by the definition of the term). Very industrial. I’m most intrigued by the background Earth stuff.

The teaser should be attached to the Abrams-produced “Cloverfield,” which opens this Friday.

Head to our forum to discuss this development!

1:20 p.m. update on Jan. 17, 2008: The first photo of the U.S.S Enterprise from the new “Star Trek” turned up at Moviefone on Thursday. The photo can be seen below and a larger version can be found here. It appears to be taken from the teaser and be the reveal shot we first mentioned above. Here’s a link to Paramount’s official “Star Trek” Web site.

The first photo of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the new Star Trek film
The first photo of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the new “Star Trek” film.
Photo credit: Moviefone


11:57 a.m. update on Jan. 18, 2008: IESB.net just posted the unofficial “Star Trek” teaser trailer!

1:16 p.m. update on Jan. 20, 2008: “Star Trek” producer Roberto Orci has gone public about the intentions by the filmmakers for the “moderately esoteric and largely eerie teaser”. Read all about it in our forums here!

1:15 p.m. update on Jan. 21, 2008: Yahoo! now has the “Star Trek” teaser trailer in HD!

3:09 p.m. update on Jan. 23, 2008: The first “Star Trek” viral marketing site has just gone live at NCC-1701.com. It was discovered by clicking a red dot near the “under construction” label on the official film site.

HollywoodChicago.com staff writer Shane Hazen

By SHANE HAZEN
Staff Writer
HollywoodChicago.com
shane@hollywoodchicago.com

colinericbarnard's picture

Canon Violations

….because Star Trek was built on continuity and believability….and for this to be part of the whole, rather than a “reimagining” that insults, denigrates and disrespects 40 years of fandom (who pay Paramount’s bills, BTW), this piece of ‘drek’ won’t be worth watching……..

TWOK was not a Trek film either! Harve Bennett and Nick Meyer knew as much about Trek as George Bush knows about Canada….Saavik is a male name, and the entire crew was wearing British Army uniforms c1890 without the bearskin busbies….and the Enterprise was a training veseel for “space cadets” and Spock would never have captained a Starship….and Khan was a waste where as in “Space Seed” he was a three-dimensional, nuanced, socially relevant character…….a piece of garbage that I have only watched once in 26 years, whereas TMP is my favourite film of all time!

….and thanks for correcting my spelling of canon….appreciated….watch BSG…Ron Moore actually has integrity……

Anonymous's picture

This is great. Everyone up

This is great. Everyone up in arms about a movie that won’t come out for almost a year. “Oh, they got the timeline messed up!” Hey, there’s two actors playing the same role - one old, one young. I don’t think the timeline is that big of a deal. “Page x in some fictional tech manual said something vague about how a ship was built!” so what? Earth or space, the thing had to get built somewhere, somehow. There will probably be a forum later on if a character’s hair is parted on the wrong side. Oh, the horror. I’m surprised nobody has petitioned Simon Pegg to get part of his finger cut off to be more in favor of James Doohan’s portrayal. (I bet he’ll have it removed via CG)

It’s a MOVIE!!! Don’t get me wrong, I like me my Star Trek. Got all the shows on DVD, all the movies on my iPod. But whatever happened to the good old days of just enjoying a show for what it is - harmless entertainment.

I quote Shatner from SNL: “Get a life.”

colinericbarnard's picture

Continuity

Look, if some 47 year old guy in Oshawa Canada who has seen the original 79 episodes a number of times each, and read most, if not all of what Roddenberry has said about Star Trek and his unifying philosphy behind it, and with Mr. Orci and Kurtzman avowed fans and continuity-freaks just like moi, how difficult is it really to stick with canon?

Paramount’s Marketing Department is doing an unbelievably fantastic job of generating ‘buzz’ for this film. There is an article on line or in the papers nearly every day. I saw Quinto’s and Pine’s pic in today’s Toronto Sun. My point is that this film is nothing more than a $150 million advert for the 800+ episodes that have preceeded it. Some marketer has decided that by going back to Kirk and Spock, new fans (sorry- ‘consumers’) can be attracted to the ‘franchise’ so that product can continue to be shipped. That product includes newly remastered and re-effect-ed TOS episodes (which are selling like hotcakes, BTW), with NextGen and follow-on series to come. However, Paramount is also Para-noid about alienating established fans like myself who know as much or more about canon than the hacks at the studio. That’s why there have been press releases like the ones concerning Orci and Kurtzman being fans and respectful of canon. But it ain’t so…..

Simply by engaging in this cynical marketing of what is essentially a nostalgia trip totally negates what the essence of Star Trek was about. Star Trek TOS was about plot-driven stories with a sociopolitical subtext that only occasionally dealved into character moments. Those moments always served the story. What we have now is the complete reverse: totally character driven story with a throw away time travel plot (which has been done about 100 of the 800 episode or more). And we already know these characters! We have known them for 40 years!

Roddenberry would be apalled. I am apalled. May this film live short and flounder…..

Anonymous's picture

JJ Abrams will be Star Trek's salvation

And it was nerds obsessing over minutiae that ruined the fun of the show. People like me who enjoyed the series and movies have had to remain closeted in mixed company for DECADES because of questions like these.

Frankly, I hope Abrams changes the smallest things just to help finally break loose the Berman barnacles that have eroded the franchise. I hope stardates change because it will cause thousands of people to whine and complain that the eternal, unerring technical manuals and newsgroup FAQs are now contradicted. I hope dilithium crystals are replaced with clown farts for the same reasons.

Star Trek has become “OH NO WERE TRAPPED BY SOME ALIENS WITH NIPPLES ON THEIR FOREHEADS THANKS TO A CREATIVITY DEFICIT IN OUR MAKEUP DEPARTMENT!” “Well let’s just reverse the bussard collector and recalibrate the deflector dish and reverse the shield harmonics and blabbity bloo: episode over, because we’re just as drained for creativity in the writing department. It worked last week, so it should work this week as well.”

It’s fiction. It’s not about facts, not even invented facts. Throw yourself into the spirit of the adventure, because that’s what Star Trek is about.

Anonymous's picture

Uber cool aliens, dude!

Anonymous wrote:
4
Star Trek has become “OH NO WERE TRAPPED BY SOME ALIENS WITH NIPPLES ON THEIR FOREHEADS THANKS TO A CREATIVITY DEFICIT IN OUR MAKEUP DEPARTMENT!”

Obviously, you’re not familiar with Gene Roddenberry’s Star Trek, but rather you’re wishing for “uber cool space stuff”. Gene said many times that he wanted the aliens to look as human as possible so the audience could relate. This has been honored throughout the Star Trek series.

Anonymous's picture

No Star Trek franchise has

No Star Trek franchise has had aliens as creative as the Original Series. One thing that Enterprise had that was genuinely Trek were *STAR* *TREK* *ALIENS*: Tellarites, Gorn, Andorians, Orion. Otherwise, Since Roddenberry’s death it’s just the same variation on the same theme over: ridges or bumps, ridges or bumps. Occasionally a labia or two. They even got into weird jewelry with some of the species. But it’s just simply been a dearth in variety.

Anonymous's picture

it's might still be ok

As long as we’re talking continuity.

There are many things that happen before Kirk commands the Enterprise. Many of the people we see in the caslist were not friends during their academy years. Some didn’t even know each other, were on different ships, had totally different groups of friends. So it’s true at first glance there seems to be a problem here.

The only answer therefor can be that this movie has a clever answer for that. Maybe it shifts between several time-periods. So the acamdemy section maybe set years before the Enterprise sections. Let’s hope it’s something like that, or else maybe, the time-travelling Spock assembles the crew in order to save the future and afterwards everyone’s memory is erased or reset, as hasbeen done numerous times in episodes.What I am saying is, there could be various ways of doing this in keeping with established cannon and we whouldn’t judge the film before it’s finished.

I doubt these filmmakers take all the backstories into account, and I would have to say those backstories are contradictory in and of themselves many times. But I do hope they at least try to keep with what has been established, some things are easily avoided.

It has been stated (in cannon) that the Enterprise was built in space, but the materials had to come from somehwhere and I don’t think it has ever been established that parts of it could never have been built on Earth. As opposed to the Enterprise D which was built at the Utopia Planetia fleet yards on Mars (also a planet one might add)

So maybe it was merely assembled in earth orbit, much as the International Space Station is today.

Anonymous's picture

Star Trek Teaser Trailer

No one who says “cannon” when they mean “canon” deserves to have what they say given any respect.

Anonymous's picture

Re: Star Trek Teaser Trailer

As long as we’re being anal, he did not say “cannon.” He wrote it. Should I respect your criticism?

Anonymous's picture

its a teaser

its a teaser, it doesnt gurantee/reflect what could be in the final film 100%

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing

TV, DVD, BLU-RAY & THEATER REVIEWS

  • Manhunt

    CHICAGO – Patrick McDonald of HollywoodChicago.com appears on “The Morning Mess” with Dan Baker on WBGR-FM (Monroe, Wisconsin) on March 21st, 2024, reviewing the new streaming series “Manhunt” – based on the bestseller by James L. Swanson – currently streaming on Apple TV+.

  • Topdog/Underdog, Invictus Theatre

    CHICAGO – When two brothers confront the sins of each other and it expands into a psychology of an entire race, it’s at a stage play found in Chicago’s Invictus Theatre Company production of “Topdog/Underdog,” now at their new home at the Windy City Playhouse through March 31st, 2024. Click TD/UD for tickets/info.

Advertisement



HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter

archive

HollywoodChicago.com Top Ten Discussions
referendum
tracker