Interview: Director Jack C. Newell on Digital Release of ‘Open Tables’

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
No votes yet

CHICAGO – Local filmmaking has always gotten a boost through director Jack C. Newell. His 2015 film “Open Tables,” shot in Chicago and Paris, will get it’s digital release on Tuesday, December 6th, 2016, on iTunes and Video-On-Demand. This coincides with his art project “The Wabash Lights,” and his continued production work.

“Open Tables” features couples and groups meeting in restaurants, talking about their lives and relationships. Although the centerpiece is food, the meal is the conversation, including a story about a sojourn into Paris – shot in black and white. Newell directed the film in the improvisation style rooted in the Chicago comedy scene, much like his first narrative film, “Close Quarters,” which featured many local improvisation artists. He also takes on the lead role as Ryan, who defines himself through the adventure in Paris. The film explores and provides perspective on the elusiveness of relationships.

Open Tables
Jack C. Newell in a Scene From ‘Open Tables’
Photo credit: Riain Rising

Besides the art project, which is currently in a Kickstarter campaign, Jack C. Newell has been working on two documentaries, “Courses” and “How to Build a School in Haiti.” To complete his last couple of years, he also took a position as the head of TV, Film and Digital at The Second City, and directed a feature film called “Hope Springs Eternal.” In anticipation of “Open Tables” December 2nd release, talked to the director about the film and his career. The gathering of people around food plays a major role in ‘Open Tables.’ Would you characterize this as a food movie?

Jack C. Newell: What many people say about food movies is that you can’t taste what is in the film, you can only look at it, and I’ve found that interesting – it can look beautiful, but it may taste like dog shit. [laughs] ‘Open Tables’ doesn’t focus on eating, but the fellowship of bringing people together around a meal. That is one thing that the film can do well, show the relationships of people coming together, and how it affects them. You used Chicago and its neighborhoods in different ways in ‘Open Tables.’ With the emerging Chicago film industry, where do you think the character of the city resides, and how do you think it can be or is exploited in films?

Newell: I feel like in American films, New York City is a character, Chicago is a character, and the rest is Anytown, U.S.A. Chicago is interesting because it can be Chicago, or it can take on the Anytown aspect. I think we need a homegrown movement that will make Chicago an Anytown, only because once the city comes into focus I think an out-of-town audiences have trouble connecting to it. Chicago doesn’t have a distinct identity like New York City, beyond the hard working theme, and maybe crime. What is cool about Chicago is that you can make it look like a lot of different places. You work closely with The Second City style of improvisation within your films. What is an example of that technique getting tangled up on a set, and what is another example of the magic that can occur in that technique?

Newell: The magic is authenticity, I have a hard time with anything that feels remotely false. The thing I love about improvisation is the fear behind your eyes, that the moment is only happening once. In my films, people can take chances and react while listening to their fellow performers and being in the moment, which happens in good improv.

How can it get tangled? Well, people can easily go off in tangents. We avoided that in ‘Open Tables’ because we played a lot of improv games in the film, but they were all hidden. The scenes with one of the foursomes in the film – T.J. Jagodowski, Desmin Borges, Linda Orr and Colleen Doyle – were all improvised, except for a couple written scenes. Did you write those, or were they outlined?

Newell: Well, one of them was just the improv game ‘Look Away,’ which I taught them on set. We’re filming and I thought I was being this genius improvisation director, and T.J. came up to me, and we started chatting. I asked him if he’d done this type of work, and he said it was a ‘First Line/Last Line’ technique [scenes are developed from first and last lines]. He picked that up instinctively, because what I had written was just a big last line. You have an admiration for Charlie Chaplin, and you include a Chaplin-esque sequence in Paris in ‘Open Tables.’ Where do you think the mood that Chaplin created in his greatest films appears in your film?

Newell: It’s definitely pathos, that was probably Chaplin’s greatest emotional contribution to cinema. The whole idea of the Ryan character that I play is that he is in Paris – the City of Love – and he’s miserable because he’s not in love. That is his pathos. I think most people connect to that, and it’s what I connect to.

One more pull from Chaplin in the film has its roots at the conclusion of ‘City Lights,’ that beautiful open-ended ending. I wanted ‘Open Tables’ to end in that same zone. At the beginning of the film, everything is definitive and comes to conclusions. Towards the end, there is more ambiguity, and specifically I wanted the end scene to have some questions around it. The film also gives its center to the Ryan character that you portray. Was there any scenes that were difficult because you had difficulties determining how you were portraying the character, or do you find it easier to include that one character that you know will set the right tone, since you’ve lived with the piece as its creator?

Newell: One easy answer was to cast good actors around me, and I really mean that. There were times in the dinner scenes that I was just grateful to be around the other cast members. I knew I could do the main character, because I felt if another person did it that they might turn it into a Woody Allen-type persona – it was close to that territory.

I knew where Ryan would work, and how to keep him in the parameter that I had conceived. The characters of Ryan and Cassie are the core of the film, and the first three quarters of the film is a treatise on why relationships don’t work, and it’s really that last scene that becomes about telling the truth, which is my philosophy on how a relationship should work. So while most of the film focuses on why relationships don’t work, we still keep trying, we want to keep trying. What was your favorite moments with Ryan?

Newell: Paris is the sequence that I’m most proud of, I think it’s the best filmmaking in the movie. It was interesting because it went opposite to how we’re told to make films. We landed in Paris on Thursday, the next two days I was casting the two French actors I worked with, Sunday we shot some scenes, and then Monday we shot all the interior scenes with the actors because it was raining. We had some pick-ups on Tuesday and Wednesday, but by Thursday we were done. It was just me and [cinematographer] Stephanie Dufford from America, and then we hired cast and crew locally, and it forced us to do the best work we could possibly do. We were definitely on the high wire without a net. I feel it was simply the best producing and directing I’ve ever done, and a great experience.

Jack C. Newell
Director Jack C. Newell (center) During the Filming of ‘Open Tables’
Photo credit: Patrick McDonald for One of the elements of the late 1950s French New Wave was the freedom that lighter and more agile equipment gave the look of their films. What feeling did you have as you were actually filming in Paris, as the metaphoric gods of the New Wave looked over your shoulder?

Newell: The whole black-and-white, four by three aspect ratio, is intentionally New Wave, I was trying to evoke that type of freedom. I wanted the sequence to have a perfectness about it, so when we come back to color and 16 by 9 that resolves an idea. It was absolutely intentional. The new digital technology is a ‘new wave’ breakthrough as well. It’s cheaper and accessible, and there is more opportunity for improvisation. But it doesn’t change what is important, which is the storytelling. You are also involved in ‘The Wabash Lights’ project, an artistic light installation underneath the elevated tracks on Wabash Avenue in downtown Chicago. What are the origins of this concept, and how important is it to you to create beyond filmmaking in your life?

Newell: Before I made my first feature film, I was contemplating changing my career direction, but once I got that feature under my belt I fell in love with it all over again. But part of the other direction had to do with a class I taught at Columbia College called ‘Creativity, Vision and Processes,’ in which students were assigned to do a different art form outside their major concentration. If, for example, they were self identified as directors, they had to paint, dance or do poetry. There were many interesting things that came out of that class, the main thing is that people block themselves in their concentration of one art form, and doing something else frees that thought process.

The Wabash Lights Project is similar to a directing job – the logistics are management, creative vision and technical control – the lights are similar, just on a different canvas. Film has an incredible power to evoke emotion. The lights have a similar power, and it has a wider inclusivity. We wanted to be experience creators through a different type of infrastructure. You’re currently working on a documentary set in Haiti. Where is the status of that project, and are you working on anything else?

Newell: We have completed principal photography on ‘How to Build a School in Haiti,’ and are now working towards getting to the rough cut. The last push of filming has been about getting experts to provide context about Haiti for people who aren’t already intimately familiar with the country and some of the issues associated with it. It’s still almost entirely verité, but we are adding experts.

I’ve completed another documentary called ‘Courses,’ and it’s a profile of a Chicago chef named Jake Bickelhaupt. It started with me filming him running an illegal restaurant out of his house, and he has since opened 42 Grams in Uptown Chicago. It’s one third artistic, one third a profile and one third about the food. We’re currently submitting it to film festivals. You also stepped into a project as a director for hire. What is the status of that film?

Newell: The project is called “Hope Springs Eternal,” which had a 750 thousand dollar budget. Status is that the producers are working to sell it now, but it will probably be released in mid-2017. One of the early nicknames for motion pictures was ‘The Magic Lantern.’ How does that lantern still provide a beacon of truth, and what magical properties has it personally given you as a life path?

Newell: Everybody who creates film are aiming for that truth you talk about. In the end, a film should reveal something true about the human condition. This provides for the audience an insight, and can increase empathy for the subject matter and lives presented. To gain more empathy by watching other people’s stories is ideally what I want film to do, and what I have received from it.

“Open Tables” will be released on iTunes and Video-On-Demand, Tuesday, December 6th, 2016. See providers for VOD locations. Featuring Jack C. Newell, Beth Lacke, David Pasquesi, Desmin Borges, Caroline Neff and Joel Murray. Written and directed by Jack C. Newell. Not rated. For more information on “The Wabash Lights” art installation, click here. senior staff writer Patrick McDonald

Writer, Editorial Coordinator

© 2016 Patrick McDonald,

User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing


Advertisement on Twitter

archive Top Ten Discussions