HollywoodChicago.com RSS   Facebook   HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter   Free Giveaway E-mail   

TV Review: Kelsey Grammer Should Know Better Than ‘Hank’

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
No votes yet

CHICAGO – Kelsey Grammer is such a TV veteran, a major part of two of the best sitcoms in the history of the medium in “Cheers” and “Frasier,” that it makes his decision to do something as generic, predictable, and unfunny as ABC’s “Hank” all the more disappointing. You would think he knew better by now.

HollywoodChicago.com Television Rating: 1.5/5.0
Television Rating: 1.5/5.0

Not even as funny as Grammer’s last misstep, “Back to You,” “Hank” plays more like a spoof of what you’d expect Grammer to do post-“Frasier”. At least with “Back to You” he was trying to mix up audience expectations a bit and had a talented ensemble to riff off of. “Hank” could have practically been called “The Kelsey Grammer Show” as he’s so front-and-center in nearly every scene.

Kelsey Grammer, Melinda McGraw, David Koechner, Jordan Hinson, Nathan Gamble.
Kelsey Grammer, Melinda McGraw, David Koechner, Jordan Hinson, Nathan Gamble.
Photo credit: ABC/Bob D’Amico

The title character in Hank could have been one of Frasier and Niles Crane’s wine-drinking buddies, except this character isn’t given anything funny to do or say. “Hank” is another fish-out-of-water story about a rich sporting-goods CEO named Hank Pryor (Grammer) sent packing by the board after a financial scandal. The snobby ripped-from-the-headlines tycoon is forced back to River Bend, VA with his wife Tilly (Melinda McGraw) and their two cliched children (Nathan Gamble & Jordan Hinson). The often scene-stealing David Koechner (“Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy,” “Extract”) pops up as Tilly’s country brother.

Kelsey Grammer, Jordan Hinson.
Kelsey Grammer, Jordan Hinson.
Photo credit: ABC/Patrick Wymore

Hank Pryor is yet another inept sitcom father, the idea being that he spent so much time in the board room that he has no idea how to actually raise his family. His spoiled wife isn’t much better although she’s such a two-dimensional cliche in the premiere that it’s hard to really say. What happens when you take away the nannies and the economic bust forces formerly rich parents to actually have to raise their children?

The truly sad thing about “Hank” is it shows signs of why Grammer is one of the most successful sitcom stars in history. He can still deliver a snobby put-down like no one else. But he’s rarely given anything worth delivering. The script for “Hank” (by Tucker Cawley) plays like something out of the early ’90s, as if this is what Grammer turned down post-“Cheers” and somebody pulled it off the turnaround shelf and dusted it off.

Television has come a long way since then and comedy this stale and predictable just doesn’t work any more. Next to something as fresh as “Modern Family” and “The Middle” - two vastly superior shows on the same evening - “Hank” looks even more like a TV relic.

It’s impossible to say for sure that a comedian as talented as Grammer can’t turn this around and bring “Hank” up to where it needs to be but it’s going to need better writers and maybe even a bit of recasting. I can’t imagine the ratings will be sufficient for ABC to stick with the show long enough to make those changes. We’ll all remember “Frasier” and just try to forget “Hank”.

‘Hank,’ which airs on ABC, premieres on September 30th, 2009 at 7PM CST. It stars Kelsey Grammer, Melinda McGraw, David Koechner, Jordan Hinson, and Nathan Gamble. It was created by Tucker Cawley.

HollywoodChicago.com content director Brian Tallerico

By BRIAN TALLERICO
Content Director
HollywoodChicago.com
brian@hollywoodchicago.com

TV Obsessed's picture

Hank sucked all around. The

Hank sucked all around. The writing was horrible and the acting wasn’t much better. The concept of the show actually sounds okay, but the execution was horrendous. Full review of the episode.

http://th3tvobsessed.blogspot.com/2009/10/abcs-hank-masive-bore.html

Durand's picture

What were they thinking?

Aside from the fact that this show is drone, drab and devoid of humor, I am insulted by the premise. Wealthy couple suddenly forced to downgrade to middle class. Fish out of water hilarity is supposed to ensue.

Are the writers and producers so insulated or insensitive as to not recognize the much more desperate plight of many who have lost homes or are struggling to keep them out of foreclosure. Or how about the ones who’ve had to downgrade their families to a room, or the car.

With this occurring daily en mass, how could Hank and his crew bemoaning their 4 bedroom; 2 storied; family room and living room; front and back yard; porch attached home possibly be comical.

When I heard Kelsey’s character Hank whine, “well no more long walks to the kitchen, the dining room is right there.” , I was insulted and not the least bit entertained.

The house Hank built cannot be saved. The foundation is too weak. “Consuela! Oh…right.” tsk. tsk.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Hot stories on the Web


User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing

TV, DVD, BLU-RAY & THEATER REVIEWS

  • Kingpin Blu-ray

    CHICAGO – Before 1998’s “The Big Lebowski” there was 1996’s “Kingpin”, the Farrelly brothers bowling comedy that didn’t have the narrative intricacies of the Coen brothers’ classic, but had plenty of jokes about middle-aged men playing the sport. Today finds the release of “Kingpin” to Blu-ray for the first time, coming with only one new special feature.

  • Star Trek Into Darkness

    CHICAGO – With J.J. Abrams not involved with the creation of a third “Star Trek” movie, a compendium of his work within the franchise only seems fitting. Loaded with special features but only a few new ones, this disc set is a strong choice for those who don’t already have both entertaining blockbusters in their collection.

Advertisement


HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter

archive

HollywoodChicago.com Top Ten Discussions
tracker