HollywoodChicago.com RSS   Facebook   HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter   Free Giveaway E-mail   

TV Review: USA Network Finds Another Potential Gem in ‘Royal Pains’

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionE-mail page to friendE-mail page to friendPDF versionPDF version
No votes yet

CHICAGO – Premiere episodes of new series really only have to pass one test - will you return for the second week? The jury is still out on the health of a whole season, but the premiere of USA’s new “Royal Pains” is clever, witty, and promising enough that most viewers are very likely to return to see the good doctor in week two.

HollywoodChicago.com Television Rating: 3.5/5.0
Television Rating: 3.5/5.0

The USA Network has become one of the most successful on cable with an interesting formula - mix a charismatic lead who happens to be an expert at what he does, a partner to provide comedic relief, a mystery of the week, and maybe an overarching plotline to tie it all together. Serve it all in a unique setting.

Royal Pains
Royal Pains
Photo credit: Justin Stephens

Monk,” “In Plain Sight,” the leads on “Psych,” “Burn Notice,” and now “Royal Pains” - there’s a definite character-driven through-line for all these shows. It may not break the mold, but if you like USA’s programming, “Royal Pains” should be quality TV medicine that agrees with you.

When “Royal Pains” opens, young doctor Hank Lawson (Mark Feuerstein) appears to have it all. He’s got a sexy girlfriend, swanky apartment in the Big Apple, and a thriving career. When one decision goes very worng, he ends up unemployed, single, and blacklisted from the medical community.

Hank’s brother (Paulo Costanzo) whisks his sibling off for a wild weekend in the Hamptons and things get very unusual for the good doctor. The two crash a mega-mansion to go to a party and Hank jumps into action when a guest requires medical attention. Word travels fast among the rich and famous and Hank is quickly the go-to guy when the mega-rich need medical care. He’s a “concierge doctor,” whether he likes it or not.

Royal Pains
Royal Pains
Photo credit: Justin Stephens

Jill Flint, Reshma Shetty, and the great Campbell Scott co-star in the first episode. The cast is uniformly good although Costanzo’s wacky brother routine is a bit over-played in the pilot. Hopefully, this character will get some added depth and they’ll tone down the slightly strained attempts at comic relief.

“Royal Pains” is a deceptively simple show that masks how clever something like that is to pull off. There’s no overall mystery in the first episode, one that runs nearly 90 minutes without commercials. It plays much more like a feature film that a typical TV show. Feuerstein’s Hank has a complete character arc, falling from the top of his game and finding new friends and a new life in the Hamptons.

It’s an excellent script with tight, clever dialogue that doesn’t overplay the “playground of the rich” element. My biggest concern going in was that the wealthy patients of Dr. Lawson would be caricatures but that is far from the case, especially with the multi-faceted Scott playing the richest man in town.

Where will “Royal Pains” go from here? There’s a promising romance blooming, several supporting characters to keep things interesting, and a fantastic central performance from the immensely likable Feuerstein. With the super-cool Michael Westen on “Burn Notice” as his partner, these two gentlemen should make up one of the best blocks of television all summer long.

‘Royal Pains,’ which airs on USA, stars Mark Feuerstein, Paulo Costanzo, Jill Flint, Reshma Shetty, and Campbell Scott. The premiere airs on June 4th, 2009 at 9PM CST.

HollywoodChicago.com content director Brian Tallerico

By BRIAN TALLERICO
Content Director
HollywoodChicago.com
brian@hollywoodchicago.com

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Hot stories on the Web


User Login

Free Giveaway Mailing

TV, DVD, BLU-RAY & THEATER REVIEWS

  • Bad Words

    Looming over “Bad Words” is the potential it could have had, as is, were it released ten years ago. With its focus of R-rated behavior poking at the projected innocence of children, along with the couple of chromosomes that keep Bateman’s Trilby from being a Vince Vaughn character, this movie is certainly a product of the comedies that have sculpted out the manchild story in the past decade.

  • Winter's Tale

    The theatrical poster for “Winter’s Tale,” after promising that “It’s not a true story, it’s a love story,” made a large demand from its viewers at the bottom: “This Valentine’s Day, Believe In Miracles.” While there is indeed a difference between filmmaking and marketing, it is hard to not imagine writer/director Akiva Goldsman whispering “believe in miracles” into the ear of every executive who helped “Winter’s Tale” come to life, immediately after throwing glitter on them.

Advertisement


HollywoodChicago.com on Twitter

archive

HollywoodChicago.com Top Ten Discussions
referendum
tracker